Document Type : Research articles

Authors

1 Community Health Research Center, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. mina.mohammady@khuisf.ac.ir

2 Community Health Research Center, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. m.radmehr@khuisf.ac.ir

3 Clinical research development unit, Kashani hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Basic Medical Sciences Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. atahmoures@khuisf.ac.ir

5 Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. st_hashemi@med.mui.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: Pathogen-contaminated surfaces are known to transmit Healthcare-Associated Infections in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. Existing hospital-cleaning procedures alone are not enough to prevent the growth of microorganisms over time. Since copper alloy has inherent and continuous antibacterial properties, copper surfaces offer a solution to complement these procedures.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the antibacterial effects of copper-coated surfaces on the bacterial burden in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: This clinical controlled trial was conducted in a general ICU. The bacterial burden was measured on five surfaces that were coated with a copper alloy foil (purity 99.94%, 100-micron thickness) and five similar surfaces without the copper coating (n=60 each). The total bacterial burden and the colonization rate of Staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and gram-negative bacilli were measured on different surfaces. The collected data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fishers exact, Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: The cumulative bacterial burden was lower on copper-coated surfaces than on control surfaces. The copper-coated surfaces were found to have a significantly (95.96%) lower mean bacterial burden (145.20 colony-forming units [CFU]/100 cm2, n=60 surfaces) than the control surfaces (3,598.74 CFU/100 cm2, n=60 surfaces; P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that placing a copper coating on the surface of five common, highly touched objects in ICU rooms reduced the bacterial burden by 96%, as compared with control surfaces.

Keywords

  1. Haque M, Sartelli M, McKimm J, Bakar MA. Health care-associated infections – An overview. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:2321-33. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S177247. [PubMed: 30532565].
  2. Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4 . [PubMed: 21146207].
  3. Izadi N, Eshrati B, Mehrabi Y, Etemad K, Hashemi-Nazari SS. The national rate of intensive care units-acquired infections, one-year retrospective study in Iran. BMC Public Health.2021;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10639-6. [PubMed: 33781227].
  4.  Palumbo A J, Loveless PA, Moll ME,  Ostroff S. Evaluation of healthcare-associated   infection surveillance in Pennsylvania hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(2):35-11. DOI: 10.1086/663709. [PubMed: 22227977].
  5. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, Agarwal R, Williams K, Brennan PJ, et al. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(2):101-14. doi: 10.1086/657912 . [PubMed: 21460463].
  6. Kundrapu S, Sunkesula V, Jury LA, Sitzlar BM, Donskey CJ. Daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces in isolation rooms to reduce contamination of healthcare workers' hands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012;33(10):1039-42. doi: 10.1086/667730 . [PubMed: 22961024].
  7. Lei H, Li Y, Xiao S, Yang X, Lin C, Norris SL, Wei D, Hu Z, Ji S, et al. Logistic growth of a surface contamination network and its role in disease spread. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13840-z.
  8. Cobrado L, Silva-Dias A, Azevedo MM, Rodrigues AG. High-touch surfaces: microbial neighbours at hand. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(11):2053-62. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3042-4 . [PubMed: 28647859].
  9. Cooper RA, Griffith CJ, Malik RE, Obee P, Looker N. Monitoring the effectiveness of cleaning in four British hospitals. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(5):338-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.07.015 . [PubMed: 17577482].
  10. EPA. EPA registers copper-containing alloy products | Pesticides | US EPA. (2008). Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20080714223723/http:/ /www.epa.gov/ pesticides/factsheets/copper-alloy-products.htm. (Accessed: 2nd June 2021)
  11. Michels HT, Keevil CW, Salgado CD, Schmidt MG. From laboratory research to a clinical trial: copper alloy surfaces kill bacteria and reduce hospital-acquired infections. HERD. 2015;9(1):64-79. doi: 10.1177/1937586715592650 . [PubMed: 26163568].
  12. Santo CE, Quaranta D, Grass G. Antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces kill Staphylococcus haemolyticus via membrane damage. Microbiologyopen. 2012;1(1):46-52.doi: 10.1002/mbo3.2 . [PubMed: 22950011].
  13. Salgado CD, Sepkowitz KA, John JF, Cantey JR, Attaway HH, Freeman KD, Sharpe PA, Michels HT, Schmidt MG, et al. Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(5):479-86. doi: 10.1086/670207 . [PubMed: 23571364].
  14. von Dessauer B, Navarrete MS, Benadof D, Benavente C, Schmidt MG. Potential effectiveness of copper surfaces in reducing health care–associated infection rates in a pediatric intensive and intermediate care unit: A nonrandomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(8):e133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.053 . [PubMed: 27318524]
  15. Schmidt MG, Attaway HH, Sharpe PA, John Jr J, Sepkowitz KA, Morgan A, Fairey SE, Singh S, Steed LL, Cantey JR, Freeman KD, et al. Sustained reduction of microbial burden on common hospital surfaces through introduction of copper. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(7):2217-23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01032-12 . [PubMed: 22553242].
  16. Ibrahim Z, Petrusan AJ, Hooke P, Hinsa-Leasure SM. Reduction of bacterial burden by copper alloys on high-touch athletic center surfaces. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.028 . [PubMed: 29102052].
  17. Casini B, Tuvo B, Totaro M, Aquino F, Baggiani A, Privitera G, et al. Evaluation of the cleaning procedure efficacy in prevention of nosocomial infections in healthcare facilities using cultural method associated with high sensitivity luminometer for ATP detection. Pathogens. 2018;7(3):1-9. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7030071. [PubMed:  30200291].
  18. Borkow G, Okon-Levy N, Gabbay J. Copper oxide impregnated wound dressing: biocidal and safety studies. Wounds. 2010;22(12):301-10. [PubMed: 25901580].
  19. Karpanen TJ, Casey AL, Lambert PA, Cookson BD, Nightingale P, Miruszenko L, Elliott TS, et al. The antimicrobial efficacy of copper alloy furnishing in the clinical environment: a crossover study.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.2012;33(1):3-9.