Document Type : Research articles

Authors

1 PhD Student in Health Services Management, School on Health Managemant and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD, Professor, School on Health Managemant and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: The health has turned into one of the most important issues in different societies; hence, the demand for health-medical services has increased.
Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate and use the experiences of the military health system of other countries regarding the organizational structures of their hospitals based on the World Bank Model.
Methods: This study based on the model of Perker and Harding investigated and compared the organizational structure of military hospitals in nine countries, namely Germany, Brazil, Turkey, South Korea, South Africa, China, Pakistan, Italy, and Iran through semi-structured interviews.
Results: The findings showed that in 18 interviews, 61% of the participants were specialist and subspecialist doctors, and the work experience of 39% of the participants was between 25 and 30 years. The World Bank Model (Preker and Harding), for hospital structure, considers five dimensions, including decision rights, market exposure, residual claims, accountability, and social functions. In the dimension of the decision-making right, the findings indicated the focus of this dimension in the studied countries. Facing the goods and supplies market in a country like South Korea is left to the hospital; however, in South Africa, it is centrally conducted by the Health and Medical Commander. In countries, like South Korea, Pakistan, China, and Iran, the residual claimant is propelled through the creation of committees or supervisory boards, while hospitals have some authority over their residual claimant. In the other studied countries, the authority of all residual claimants is with the highest level of military health and treatment sector of the relevant country. In countries, such as Germany, Italy, and South Korea, accountability towards stakeholders has become decentralized. The dimension of social functions is not considered among the duties of military hospitals; nevertheless, all the studied countries practically had a relatively active presence in the field of social functions and assistance.
Conclusion: Given the importance of the health of the military community and the lack of available and published data and studies, it is necessary to make use of the experiences and learnings of this field by conducting studies on the military health system.

Keywords

  1. Rahmani R, Zareei Zavaraki E, Abbaspour A, Maleki H. Military medicine's role in the armed forces and the need to develop specialized education programs in Iran military medicine. J Mil Med. 2012;13(4):247-52.
  2. Whitley J. Five actions to improve military hospital performance. Institute for Defense Analyses; 2017.
  3. Statistical report of hospital statistics and information system. Ministry of Health; 2018.
  4. Ameryoun A, Hamzeh Atani B, Mohebbi H. Assessment of medical equipment maintenance mamagement in two military hospitals. J Mil Med. 2011;9(3):189-95.
  5. Lurie P. Comparing the costs of military treatment facilities with private sector care. IDA Paper NS: Institute for Defense Analyses; 2016.
  6. Bricknell M, Cain P. Understanding the whole of military health systems. RUSI J. 2020; 165(3):40-9. doi:10.1080/03071847.2020.1784039
  7. Zaboli R, Seyed H, Nejati Zarnaqi B, Khalilifar S. Functional analysis of hospital management in selected military hospitals using weisbord's "six-box model. Ebnesina J. 2013;15(13):31-40.
  8. Nejati Zarnaqi B, Khalilifar O, Shahraki S. Examining the organizational structure of selected hospitals in Tehran and its relationship with hospital performance indicators. Ebnesina J. 2018;18(2):40-7.
  9. Sadidi M, Amiri M, Khalilifar O, Moradi R. Technical efficiency evaluation of military hospitals in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Ebnesina J. 2019;21(1):35-48. doi:10.22034/21.1.35
  10. Meamarzadeh G, Ahmadi M. Adaptive management Second, editor. Tehran: Andishehay e gohar bar; 2008.
  11. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-44. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. [PubMed: 24193818]
  12. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications; 2014.
  13. Doshmangir L, Azimzadeh S. A comparative study of health financing frameworks. J Health Syst Res. 2018;14(2):142-52. doi:10.22122/jhsr.v14i2.3273
  14. Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research; 2009.
  15. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. [PubMed:24047204]
  16. Preker A, Harding A. Innovations in health service delivery: The corporatization of public hospitals. Washington DC: World Bank; 2003.
  17. Harding A, Preker A. Understanding organizational reform. Washington DC: World Bank; 2000.
  18. Leone R, Homan Z, Bandekow L, Bricknell M. Analysis of international military health systems using the military medical corps worldwide Almanac. Mil Med. 2021;186(9-10):1017-23. doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa376. [PubMed: 33241312]
  19. Mosadeghrad A, Rahimitabar P. Health system governance in Iran: A comparative study. Razi J Med Sci. 2019;26(9):10-28. doi:20.1001.1.22287043.1398.26.9.1.7